Philosophy shapes tone, not evidence
Saved philosophy can guide language and emphasis, but StoryLoop still keeps the story grounded in the observation supplied for that day.
Centre voice
Centre Voice Memory lets educators or centre teams save a philosophy, preferred wording, and phrases to avoid so future drafts match local practice more closely.
Saved philosophy can guide language and emphasis, but StoryLoop still keeps the story grounded in the observation supplied for that day.
When a centre prefers practical language, certain cultural wording, or a shorter style, those preferences can become part of the drafting context.
Centre plans make voice consistency more useful across educators while keeping each story editable and educator-led.
FAQ
Yes. Individual educators can save personal voice preferences, while centre plans are positioned for shared team rollout.
No. Preferred phrases guide tone only when they fit naturally and are supported by the observation.
No. StoryLoop supports drafting and structure, while educators remain responsible for observation, interpretation, reflection, final editing, and sign-off.
Yes. Stories are editable after generation and saved in history, so educators can add context, adjust wording, copy, export, or regenerate from the original observation.
StoryLoop is designed to avoid generic, poetic AI wording. It asks for real observations, keeps claims evidence-based, and links curriculum only when the observation supports it.
The free plan includes 3 learning stories per month. Upgrade prompts are dismissible, and existing history remains available even if the free limit is reached.