Evidence stays first
The review checks that learning claims connect back to the observation and that saved child context is not treated as evidence from today.
Educator review helper
StoryLoop is built to improve drafts before educators see them, then keep final judgement with the educator. The quality check looks for real evidence, natural educator voice, practical responses, and curriculum links that fit.
Start with what actually happened: one action, quote, attempt, change, or question. A polished observation is never required.
StoryLoop drafts and checks. The educator reviews, edits, decides what is true, and chooses whether anything is shared.
What StoryLoop does with a note
A real note an educator typed, and the start of the draft StoryLoop wrote from it, unedited, with the Te Whāriki links, learning and next steps to follow.
Aroha tried to put her shoes on before going outside. Velcro kept folding over. Asked 'help me' then pushed my hand away and did the second one herself. Stood up and stomped both feet.
Putting on her own shoes
Before going outside, Aroha tried to put her shoes on by herself. The Velcro kept folding over, making the job trickier. Aroha asked, "help me", letting us know clearly that she needed support.
When help was offered, Aroha pushed the adult hand away and did the second shoe herself. Once both shoes were on, she stood up and stomped both feet. This looked like Aroha checking that her shoes were on and feeling the result with her whole body.
Type what you saw today. StoryLoop writes the draft here, with Te Whāriki or EYLF V2.0 links, and shows you exactly what it is built on.
No signup for your first try. Use a first name or initial only.
Your draft appears here, with curriculum links that only claim what your note shows, usually in under a minute.
Tip: what the child did, one thing they said, and what happened next. Three lines is plenty.
Want to keep it? Start free: 3 stories a month, no card. You check every word before anything is shared.
The review checks that learning claims connect back to the observation and that saved child context is not treated as evidence from today.
The draft improvement pass looks for wording that is too poetic, too generic, or too AI-sounding, then revises toward plain educator language.
The quality check is a helper, not compliance or sign-off. Educators still review the draft, add local knowledge, and decide what is accurate enough to share.
FAQ
No. StoryLoop calls it a story quality check because it supports educator review without replacing professional judgement.
It checks educator tone, child voice, learning dispositions, framework fit, next steps, invented-detail risk, and whether the interpretation is connected to evidence.
No. StoryLoop supports drafting and structure, while educators remain responsible for observation, interpretation, reflection, final editing, and sign-off.
Yes. Stories are editable after generation and saved in history, so educators can add context, adjust wording, copy, export, or regenerate from the original observation.
StoryLoop is designed to avoid generic, poetic AI wording. It asks for real observations, keeps claims evidence-based, and links curriculum only when the observation supports it.
The free plan includes 3 learning stories per month. Upgrade prompts are dismissible, and existing history remains available even if the free limit is reached.