Examples · Where to next

The next step is the part of a learning story that changes tomorrow.

Most learning stories end with something like "We will continue to support Mia's interest in painting." That is not a next step. A next step names what an educator will do, offer or watch for, so whoever reads it next can act on it. Below are twelve real "where to next" sections, each written by StoryLoop from a real note and shown exactly as written, with what makes each one work.

Start with what actually happened: one action, quote, attempt, change, or question. A polished observation is never required.

StoryLoop drafts and checks. The educator reviews, edits, decides what is true, and chooses whether anything is shared.

Reviewed 13 October 2026 · Written by Leo, who builds StoryLoop, in Ōtautahi Christchurch

What StoryLoop does with a note

A rough note in, a learning story out.

A real note an educator typed, and the start of the draft StoryLoop wrote from it, unedited, with the Te Whāriki links, learning and next steps to follow.

The note · Aroha, 2 to 3 years
Aroha tried to put her shoes on before going outside. Velcro kept folding over. Asked 'help me' then pushed my hand away and did the second one herself. Stood up and stomped both feet.
The draft, as StoryLoop wrote it

Putting on her own shoes

Before going outside, Aroha tried to put her shoes on by herself. The Velcro kept folding over, making the job trickier. Aroha asked, "help me", letting us know clearly that she needed support.

When help was offered, Aroha pushed the adult hand away and did the second shoe herself. Once both shoes were on, she stood up and stomped both feet. This looked like Aroha checking that her shoes were on and feeling the result with her whole body.

Read the full draft

Now try it with your own note. No signup.

Type what you saw today. StoryLoop writes the draft here, with Te Whāriki or EYLF V2.0 links, and shows you exactly what it is built on.

No signup for your first try. Use a first name or initial only.

Your draft appears here, with curriculum links that only claim what your note shows, usually in under a minute.

Tip: what the child did, one thing they said, and what happened next. Three lines is plenty.

Want to keep it? Start free: 3 stories a month, no card. You check every word before anything is shared.

Name an action

Offer, set out, sit nearby, ask, give time. If you cannot picture a teacher doing it tomorrow morning, it is not a next step yet.

Grow it from the moment

The strongest next steps come straight from what happened in the story. Mere reached three times for the rattle, so the step is to keep objects just within reach and wait before helping.

Say what you will notice

A good next step also says what to watch for, so the next story can show change. That is the planning cycle, or notice, recognise and respond, in two sentences.

Twelve next steps, babies to five year olds

Each example below gives the educator's note, the "where to next" section exactly as StoryLoop wrote it, and why it works. They cover both Te Whāriki and EYLF V2.0.

Mere, under one: reaching for the rattle (Te Whāriki)

The note: Mere (8 months) on her tummy on the mat. Reached for the wooden rattle just out of reach, rocked forward and grabbed it on the third go. Shook it and looked at me. Babbled 'ba ba'. Rolled onto her back and kept shaking it.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can continue to place safe objects just within Mere’s reach so she can practise reaching, shifting her weight, and making choices. We can sit nearby, respond to her sounds, and give her time to try before offering help.

Why it works: It grows straight out of what Mere did. She reached three times before she got the rattle, so the next step keeps objects just within reach and asks adults to wait before helping.

Ruby, 1 to 2 years: ruby feeding herself (EYLF V2.0)

The note: Ruby fed herself yoghurt with a spoon at morning tea. Got most in. Put the spoon down and used her fingers for the last bit. Said 'all gone'.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can keep supporting Ruby’s independence at mealtimes by giving her time to use the spoon, while also accepting that fingers may still be part of how she manages tricky last bits. We can name what is happening in simple words, such as spoon, yoghurt, more, finished, and all gone, so Ruby keeps hearing useful mealtime language.

Why it works: It accepts where Ruby is (fingers for the last bit) instead of correcting her, and gives the exact words to model at the table.

Tama, 1 to 2 years: more sand (Te Whāriki)

The note: Tama at the sandpit, filled the red bucket with the scoop, tipped it out, did it again and again. Said "more sand" when it was empty. Carried it to the water trough and poured it in and watched it sink.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can support Tama by keeping simple scooping and pouring tools available at the sandpit and water trough. We can use clear words alongside his play, such as full, empty, pour, sink, more, and again. We will continue to notice what Tama does after he pours the sand into water. Does he repeat it, try a different container, or look for more sand? This will help us follow his thinking as he explores cause and effect.

Why it works: It names the words to use and sets a question to answer next time: does Tama repeat it, try a different container, or go looking for more sand?

Aroha, 2 to 3 years: putting on her own shoes (Te Whāriki)

The note: Aroha tried to put her shoes on before going outside. Velcro kept folding over. Asked 'help me' then pushed my hand away and did the second one herself. Stood up and stomped both feet.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can support Aroha by giving her time to try first before stepping in. When she asks for help, we can offer just enough support, such as holding the shoe steady or pointing to the Velcro, then pause so she can take over again. We will continue to notice how Aroha manages other dressing routines, such as shoes, socks, jackets, and bags. We can use simple language like, "You try first" and "I can help a little bit" so Aroha can keep building independence while still knowing support is close.

Why it works: It gives any adult in the room a script ("You try first") and a rule they can follow: offer just enough help, then pause.

Zara, 2 to 3 years: mixing green at the easel (EYLF V2.0)

The note: zara at the easel mixing blue and yellow with her fingers. said green! when it changed. covered the whole page then did her hands. showed Mia her hands.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can keep offering safe finger painting and colour mixing experiences for Zara. We can place two colours side by side and give her time to mix, notice, and name what changes. We can also support her language by using simple words during painting, such as mix, more, blue, yellow, green, wet, hand, and page. We will continue to notice whether Zara watches the colour change, names other colours, or shares her discoveries with peers again.

Why it works: It sets up the next experience precisely: two colours side by side, time to mix, and watching whether Zara names the change again.

Nikau, 3 to 4 years: leading the waiata actions (Te Whāriki)

The note: Mat time waiata, Nikau stood at the front and did the actions for Tūtira mai ngā iwi with Whaea Sue. Sang the first line loud then went quiet and just did actions. Clapped at the end.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can keep offering Nikau chances to join waiata in different ways, such as singing, doing actions, clapping, or standing near a kaiako. We can notice whether he chooses to lead again, sings more of the waiata, or uses the actions to stay involved when he is not using his voice.

Why it works: It counts doing the actions as real participation and plans more ways in, instead of pushing Nikau to sing louder.

Anika, 3 to 4 years: sharing rafi with us (Te Whāriki)

The note: Anika brought in a photo of her new baby brother. Showed everyone at kai time. Said his name is Rafi. Drew him in her book.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can support Anika by giving her time and space to revisit this interest through drawing, talking, and family play if she chooses. We can notice the words she uses for Rafi and her family, and offer simple prompts such as asking who she has drawn or what Rafi is doing in her picture. We will continue to make room for children to share family news in everyday routines, especially at kai time or small group times, where children can be listened to and see that their home life matters here.

Why it works: It follows Anika's lead ("if she chooses") and turns one moment into a routine: room at kai time for family news.

Grace, 4 to 5 years: making the marble go all the way (EYLF V2.0)

The note: Grace spent nearly 40 minutes on the marble run this morning. She started with two ramps and a funnel, but the marble kept falling off at the join. She tried taping it, which did not work, then moved the second ramp lower so it sat under the first. When it worked she called out "Look, it goes all the way now!" Then she added a third ramp and a cup at the bottom to catch it. Harvey came over and wanted to add his car. Grace showed him where to put it at the top and said "not too fast or it flies off". They took turns for the rest of the session.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can support Grace by offering more loose parts for ramps, tunnels and catch points, and by giving her time to test and change her own designs. We can use simple questions such as, "What do you think will happen if this ramp is higher?" or "How could we slow it down?" We will continue to notice how Grace plans, tests and explains her ideas when she is building.

Why it works: It offers materials and two open questions that stretch Grace's thinking without doing the building for her.

Tui, 4 to 5 years: the hut door password (Te Whāriki)

The note: Tui, Rawiri and Sam built a hut out of the crates and a sheet. Tui was in charge of the door. Said 'password please' to anyone who came. Sam said banana and she let him in.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can support this interest by offering time and space for hut building, with loose parts that children can move and arrange safely. We can listen for the rules and roles the children create, then support them to negotiate these with each other. We will continue to notice how Tui uses language in pretend play, especially when she sets up roles, invites others in, or changes the rules of the game.

Why it works: It plans to listen for the children's own rules and roles, which is where the learning in their play actually is.

Sophie, 4 to 5 years: writing her name and noticing words (EYLF V2.0)

The note: Sophie wrote her name on her drawing, S backwards, rest ok. Then copied KAI off the lunch box sign. Asked me what it spells.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can support Sophie by naming the letters and sounds in her own name during natural writing moments. We can also draw her attention to familiar words around the room, especially words connected to daily routines, and talk about what they mean. We will continue to offer real reasons to write, such as naming drawings, making signs, labelling work, or copying words that matter to her. We can gently support the direction of the S through playful practice, without taking over her writing.

Why it works: It deals with the backwards S gently, inside real writing, rather than turning it into a worksheet.

Jack, 4 to 5 years: sorting and making ten (EYLF V2.0)

The note: Jack sorted the bear counters by colour into the cups. Then lined up the red ones and counted 8. Put 2 blue ones on the end and said 'now it's ten'.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can continue to offer small counting materials so Jack can sort, line up, count and combine groups in different ways. We can support his thinking with simple prompts such as, “How many are there now?” or “What could we add to make ten?” We will continue to notice how Jack counts sets, whether he checks the total after adding more, and what number strategies he uses when the groups are changed.

Why it works: Its prompts sit exactly at Jack's level ("What could we add to make ten?") and it says what to watch for: whether he checks the total.

Liam, 4 to 5 years: drawing mum sleeping (EYLF V2.0)

The note: Liam quiet at drop off, dad said mum is in hospital. Liam spent the morning at the drawing table, drew a house with 4 people and a bed. Told me 'that's mum sleeping'. Later joined the ball game with Oliver.

Where to next, as StoryLoop wrote it: We can keep offering Liam quiet spaces and open-ended drawing materials, especially during morning arrivals. We can sit nearby, notice his drawings, and give him time to talk if he chooses. We will continue to watch how Liam settles at drop off, how he uses drawing to share ideas, and how he reconnects with peers during the day. We can also support his connection with Oliver through simple ball games and small group play.

Why it works: It responds to a hard week with care and space rather than a learning target, and keeps Liam's friendship with Oliver in view.

Turning a weak next step into a strong one

Weak: "We will continue to support Zara's interest in painting." Strong: "We will place two colours side by side at the easel, give Zara time to mix, and notice whether she names the colour change again." The difference is an action, a material and something to watch for.

Weak: "Liam needs to work on his feelings." Strong: "We will keep a quiet drawing space ready at drop-off and sit nearby, giving him time to talk if he chooses." The first is a judgement. The second is what a kind adult will actually do tomorrow.

Official references

These sources inform this guide. StoryLoop is independent and does not claim endorsement.

FAQ

Straight answers for educators.

What is the difference between 'where to next' and 'possible lines of development'?+

They are different names for the same part of a learning story: how educators will respond to and extend what they noticed. Services in Aotearoa often use responding, where to next or possibilities and opportunities. Australian services often frame it as planning or extending learning, linked to the EYLF planning cycle.

How many next steps should a learning story have?+

One or two that you will actually do. A list of six intentions nobody follows up is worse than one clear action and one thing to watch for.

Should families be part of the next step?+

Where it fits, yes. Several of the examples below end with a family or whānau link: a simple way to notice or extend the same learning at home, written as an invitation rather than homework.

Are these real learning stories?+

They are real notes and the drafts StoryLoop wrote from them in its 23 September 2026 evaluation run, shown without edits. The same twelve are on the examples page in full.

Does StoryLoop replace educator thinking?+

No. StoryLoop supports drafting and structure, while educators remain responsible for observation, interpretation, reflection, final editing, and sign-off.

Can I edit the generated stories?+

Yes. Stories are editable after generation and saved in history, so educators can add context, adjust wording, copy, export, or regenerate from the original observation.

Does it create generic AI stories?+

StoryLoop is designed to avoid generic, poetic AI wording. It asks for real observations, keeps claims evidence-based, and links curriculum only when the observation supports it.

How many stories are free?+

The free plan includes 3 learning stories per month. Upgrade prompts are dismissible, and existing history remains available even if the free limit is reached.